5.4 Inverse Functions
Objectives:
-
•
Define the composition of two functions
-
•
Connect our understanding of inverse functions with composition of functions
5.4.1 Arriving at Our Goal
Our penultimate step on our journey: it is time to work with inverse functions. We have sneakily already defined them in a previous page, but now that we are in Section 5.4 we can give a formal definition:
Definition 5.4.1.
Let and be sets, and let . We say that is invertible if there exists a function such that for all and for all ,
We say that such a function is an inverse function of .
Example 5.4.2.
Show that given by is an invertible function by finding its inverse function. Then show that, if , then .
As we did on the last page, define the identity function to be the function . If it is unclear from context what the shared domain and codomain of the function are, we will clarify by adding the domain as a subscript, as we do in the theorem below.
Theorem 5.4.3.
Let and be sets, and let and . Then is invertible and is an inverse function of iff and .
We briefly review why we need the function to be bijective in order for there to be an inverse function:
-
•
If a graph is not surjective, the reflected graph will have a gap in the domain because the original function has a gap in the codomain.
-
•
If a graph is not injective, it fails the vertical line test. Hence the graph’s reflection across the line fails the vertical line test and hence is not a function.
5.4.2 Bijectivity Iff Existence of Inverse
We now show that bijectivity is exactly what we need for an inverse function to exist.
Theorem 5.4.4.
Let be a function. Then is invertible if and only if is a bijection.
(More space for Theorem 5.4.4.)
Example 5.4.5.
Let be defined by the rule for all . Show that is a bijection and find .
Theorem 5.4.6.
If and are both bijections, show that is also a bijection and that .