5 Set Theory
5.3 Properties of Set Operations
5.3.1 Beginning Activity 1 (Exploring a Relationship between Two Sets)
Let and be subsets of some universal set .
-
1.
Draw two general Venn diagrams for the sets and . On one, shade the region that represents , and on the other, shade the region that represents . Explain carefully how you determined these regions.
-
2.
Based on the Venn diagrams in Part (1), what appears to be the relationship between the sets and ?
Some of the properties of set operations are closely related to some of the logical operators we studied in Section 2.1. This is due to the fact that set intersection is defined using a conjunction (and), and set union is defined using a disjunction (or). For example, if and are subsets of some universal set , then an element is in if and only if or .
-
3.
Use one of De Morgan’s Laws (Theorem 2.8) to explain carefully what it means to say that an element is not in .
-
4.
What does it mean to say that an element is in ? What does it mean to say that an element is in ?
-
5.
Explain carefully what it means to say that an element is in .
-
6.
Compare your response in Part (3) to your response in Part (5). Are they equivalent? Explain.
-
7.
How do you think the sets and are related? Is this consistent with the Venn diagrams from Part (1)?
5.3.2 Beginning Activity 2 (Proving that Statements Are Equivalent)
-
1.
Let , and be statements. Complete a truth table for .
-
2.
Assume that , and are statements and that we have proven that the following conditional statements are true:
-
•
If then .
-
•
If then .
-
•
If then .
Explain why each of the following statements is true.
-
1.
if and only if .
-
2.
if and only if .
-
3.
if and only if .
Remember that is logically equivalent to .
5.3.3 Algebra of Sets - Part 1
This section contains many results concerning the properties of the set operations. We have already proved some of the results. Others will be proved in this section or in the exercises. The primary purpose of this section is to have in one place many of the properties of set operations that we may use in later proofs. These results are part of what is known as the algebra of sets or as set theory.
Theorem 5.17. Let , and be subsets of some universal set . Then
-
•
and .
-
•
If , then and .
Proof. The first part of this theorem was included in Exercise (7) from Section 5.2. The second part of the theorem was Exercise (12) from Section 5.2.
The next theorem provides many of the properties of set operations dealing with intersection and union. Many of these results may be intuitively obvious, but to be complete in the development of set theory, we should prove all of them. We choose to prove only some of them and leave some as exercises.
Theorem 5.18 (Algebra of Set Operations). Let , and be subsets of some universal set . Then all of the following equalities hold.
| Properties of the Empty Set | |
|---|---|
| and the Universal Set | |
| Idempotent Laws | |
| Commutative Laws | |
| Associative Laws | |
| Distributive Laws | |
Before proving some of these properties, we note that in Section 5.2, we learned that we can prove that two sets are equal by proving that each one is a subset of the other one. However, we also know that if and are both subsets of a universal set , then
We can use this to prove that two sets are equal by choosing an element from one set and chasing the element to the other set through a sequence of "if and only if" statements. We now use this idea to prove one of the commutative laws.
5.3.4 Proof of One of the Commutative Laws in Theorem 5.18
Proof. We will prove that . Let . Then
| (1) |
However, we know that if and are statements, then is logically equivalent to . Consequently, we can conclude that
| (2) |
Now we know that
| (3) |
This means that we can use (1), (2), and (3) to conclude that
and, hence, we have proved that .
5.3.5 Progress Check 5.19 (Exploring a Distributive Property)
We can use Venn diagrams to explore the more complicated properties in Theorem 5.18, such as the associative and distributive laws. To that end, let , and be subsets of some universal set .
-
1.
Draw two general Venn diagrams for the sets , and . On one, shade the region that represents , and on the other, shade the region that represents . Explain carefully how you determined these regions.
-
2.
Based on the Venn diagrams in Part (1), what appears to be the relationship between the sets and ?
5.3.6 Proof of One of the Distributive Laws in Theorem 5.18
We will now prove the distributive law explored in Progress Check 5.19. Notice that we will prove two subset relations, and that for each subset relation, we will begin by choosing an arbitrary element from a set. Also notice how nicely a proof dealing with the union of two sets can be broken into cases.
Proof. Let , and be subsets of some universal set . We will prove that by proving that each set is a subset of the other set.
We will first prove that . We let . Then or .
So in one case, if , then and . This means that .
On the other hand, if , then and . But implies that , and implies that . Since is in both sets, we conclude that . So in both cases, we see that , and this proves that .
We next prove that . So let . Then, and . We must prove that . We will consider the two cases where or . In the case where , we see that .
So we consider the case that . It has been established that and . Since and must be an element of . Similarly,
since and , must be an element of . Thus, and, hence, .
In both cases, we have proved that . This proves that . The two subset relations establish the equality of the two sets. Thus, .
5.3.7 Important Properties of Set Complements
The three main set operations are union, intersection, and complementation. Theorems 5.18 and 5.17 deal with properties of unions and intersections. The next theorem states some basic properties of complements and the important relations dealing with complements of unions and complements of intersections. Two relationships in the next theorem are known as De Morgan’s Laws for sets and are closely related to De Morgan’s Laws for statements.
Theorem 5.20. Let and be subsets of some universal set . Then the following are true:
| Basic Properties |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Empty Set and Universal Set |
|
||
| De Morgan’s Laws |
|
||
| Subsets and Complements | if and only if |
Proof. We will only prove one of De Morgan’s Laws, namely, the one that was explored in Beginning Activity 1. The proofs of the other parts are left as exercises. Let and be subsets of some universal set . We will prove that by proving that an element is in if and only if it is in . So let be in the universal set . Then
| (1) |
and
| (2) |
Combining (1) and (2), we see that
| (3) |
In addition, we know that
| (4) |
and this is true if and only if . So we can use (3) and (4) to conclude that
and, hence, that .
5.3.8 Progress Check 5.21 (Using the Algebra of Sets)
-
1.
Draw two general Venn diagrams for the sets , and . On one, shade the region that represents , and on the other, shade the region that represents . Explain carefully how you determined these regions and why they indicate that .
It is possible to prove the relationship suggested in Part (1) by proving that each set is a subset of the other set. However, the results in Theorems 5.18 and 5.20 can be used to prove other results about set operations. When we do this, we say that we are using the algebra of sets to prove the result. For example, we can start by using one of the basic properties in Theorem 5.20 to write
We can then use one of the commutative properties to write
-
1.
Determine which properties from Theorems 5.18 and 5.20 justify each of the last three steps in the following outline of the proof that .
Note: It is sometimes difficult to use the properties in the theorems when the theorems use the same letters to represent the sets as those being used in the current problem. For example, one of the distributive properties from Theorems 5.18 can be written as follows: For all sets , and that are subsets of a universal set ,
5.3.9 Proving that Statements Are Equivalent
When we have a list of three statements , and such that each statement in the list is equivalent to the other two statements in the list, we say that the three statements are equivalent. This means that each of the statements in the list implies each of the other statements in the list.
The purpose of Beginning Activity 2 was to provide one way to prove that three (or more) statements are equivalent. The basic idea is to prove a sequence of conditional statements so that there is an unbroken chain of conditional statements from each statement to every other statement. This method of proof will be used in Theorem 5.22.
Theorem 5.22. Let and be subsets of some universal set . The following are equivalent:
-
1.
-
2.
-
3.
Proof. To prove that these are equivalent conditions, we will prove that (1) implies (2), that (2) implies (3), and that (3) implies (1).
Let and be subsets of some universal set . We have proved that (1) implies (2) in Proposition 5.14.
To prove that (2) implies (3), we will assume that and use the fact that . We then see that
Then, using one of De Morgan’s Laws, we obtain
This completes the proof that (2) implies (3).
We now need to prove that (3) implies (1). We assume that and will prove that by proving that every element of must be in .
So let . Then we know that . However, and since , we can conclude that . Since , we conclude that . This proves that and hence that (3) implies (1).
Since we have now proved that (1) implies (2), that (2) implies (3), and that (3) implies (1), we have proved that the three conditions are equivalent.
5.3.10 Exercises for Section 5.3
-
1.
Let be a subset of some universal set . Prove each of the following (from Theorem 5.20):
-
(a)
-
(b)
-
(c)
-
(d)
-
(a)
-
2.
Let , and be subsets of some universal set . As part of Theorem 5.18, we proved one of the distributive laws. Prove the other one. That is, prove that
-
3.
Let , and be subsets of some universal set . As part of Theorem 5.20, we proved one of De Morgan’s Laws. Prove the other one. That is, prove that
-
4.
Let , and be subsets of some universal set .
-
(a)
Draw two general Venn diagrams for the sets , and . On one, shade the region that represents , and on the other, shade the region that represents . Based on the Venn diagrams, make a conjecture about the relationship between the sets and .
-
(b)
Use the choose-an-element method to prove the conjecture from Exercise (4a).
-
(c)
Use the algebra of sets to prove the conjecture from Exercise (4a).
-
(a)
-
5.
Let , and be subsets of some universal set .
-
(a)
Draw two general Venn diagrams for the sets , and . On one, shade the region that represents , and on the other, shade the region that represents . Based on the Venn diagrams, make a conjecture about the relationship between the sets and .
-
(b)
Use the choose-an-element method to prove the conjecture from Exercise (5a).
-
(c)
Use the algebra of sets to prove the conjecture from Exercise (5a).
-
(a)
-
6.
Let , and be subsets of some universal set . Prove or disprove each of the following:
-
(a)
-
(a)
-
(a)
-
7.
Let , and be subsets of some universal set .
-
(a)
Draw two general Venn diagrams for the sets , and . On one, shade the region that represents , and on the other, shade the region that represents . Based on the Venn diagrams, make a conjecture about the relationship between the sets and . (Are the two sets equal? If not, is one of the sets a subset of the other set?)
-
(b)
Prove the conjecture from Exercise (7a).
-
(a)
-
8.
Let , and be subsets of some universal set .
-
(a)
Draw two general Venn diagrams for the sets , and . On one, shade the region that represents , and on the other, shade the region that represents . Based on the Venn diagrams, make a conjecture about the relationship between the sets and . (Are the two sets equal? If not, is one of the sets a subset of the other set?)
-
(b)
Prove the conjecture from Exercise (8a).
-
(a)
-
9.
Let and be subsets of some universal set .
-
(a)
Prove that and are disjoint sets.
-
(a)
Prove that .
-
(a)
-
10.
Let and be subsets of some universal set .
-
(a)
Prove that and are disjoint sets.
-
(b)
Prove that .
-
(a)
-
11.
Let and be subsets of some universal set . Prove or disprove each of the following:
-
(a)
-
(b)
-
(c)
-
(d)
-
(a)
-
12.
Evaluation of proofs. See the instructions for Exercise (19) from Section 3.1.
-
(a)
If , and are subsets of some universal set , then .
Proof.
-
(b)
If , and are subsets of some universal set , then .
Proof. We first write and then use one of De Morgan’s Laws to obtain
We now use the fact that and obtain
.
-
(a)
5.3.11 Explorations and Activities
-
13.
(Comparison to Properties of the Real Numbers). The following are some of the basic properties of addition and multiplication of real numbers.
Commutative Laws: , for all . , for all .
Associative Laws: , for all . , for all .
Distributive Law: , for all .
Additive Identity: For all .
Multiplicative Identity: For all .
Additive Inverses: For all .
Multiplicative Inverses: For all with .
Discuss the similarities and differences among the properties of addition and multiplication of real numbers and the properties of union and intersection of sets.